Anyone own a Kindle? This wireless reading device costs over $350, but at 10.2 ounces, it weighs less than a paperback book-and weighs much less than the 1,500 books you can store on it. Some claim that a Kindle is cheaper than buying books. As a library devotee, there’s just no way this device would ever pay for itself in my situation. However, the Kindle intrigues me for two reasons: 1. I’ve heard it’s perfect for breastfeeding mothers because it can be held with one hand. Turn the page with just a flick of a button. 2. I’ve read arguments that a Kindle is greener than plain old paper books.
I read a lot while nursing in Audrey’s first few months and don’t remember having any problems turning the pages of regular books. A breastfeeding pillow or even a regular pillow allow for a “hands-free” nursing experience. So I can’t comment on how superior a Kindle would be in this situation.

The green argument got me thinking. Is a battery-operated gizmo eco-friendlier than its paper counterpart? Let’s say someone buys fifty books a year and keeps them all. After ten years, this person has five hundred books, which amounts to reams of paper and a few bookshelves–not to mention floor space. The Kindle could save paper, but does use up energy. Also, I’m not sure of its lifespan, but eventually it will break and need to be tossed or recycled. Real books, on the other hand, can be handed down or sold for years. At the end of their lives, books can be recycled–and they’re biodegradable!

So what do you think? Is a Kindle the newest green gadget for new mothers? Or will you stick to old-fashioned books?